Survivor needs some changes

Report
IT is ridiculous that Russell yet again was robbed from the title of sole survivor. Both times the jury's took things personally instead of playing the game. Survivor is about Outwitting, Ouplaying and Outlasting. Unfortunetly the game has gone from winning because of these three qualities to a personality contest. Survivor needs to change things up a bit and look at new ways to have the final judging. If it is America's weekly vote and final vote or keeping the jury vote but adding a vote like BigBrother. Regardless after this many years it is time to have some change.
Message |  Wave Agree (6) | Disagree (8)
Report
Russell doesn't deserve to win. Sorry. I was in the Russell camp last season thinking he played a great game. He did so this season also but he lacked any kind of social skill and that is what is needed to win the game. He is another Amanda, can get to the end but can't pull in the votes. He could have pulled some of those votes but he was just arrogant and !$#!#y and didn't think anyone else there deserved to be there. I think Parvati played the best game. She could have freaked out when Russell flipped to vote out Danielle but she stayed calm, won the immunity and regrouped. I liked this season.
Message |  Wave Agree (7) | Disagree (3)
Report
It's time to scrap the jury. A jury should be independant. But the survivor jury is not. The jury votes with their heart not their head. Therefore we have useless winners like Sandra and Natalie. If these types are being rewarded and people start playing like them hoping to win, then no one would watch and the show would die. We watch because of people like Russel, Boston Rob, Poverti etc. So I say scrap the jury, let it go to a final two (instead of three) and let the winner be decided with a challenge or two out of three challenges.
Message |  Wave Agree (3) | Disagree (4)
Report
u guys are morons
Message |  Wave Agree (6) | Disagree (0)
Report
I agree-- SURVIVOR needs a change-- my husbnd had never watched the show until samoa-- I hated russell at first but grew to respect him for his game. My husband was so piossed when Natalie won-- and that the loosers wiuth sour graped voted for natalie because thay had truly been out played. We only watche season 20 because of Russell and hoped that this group of all stars would give to the trur winner-- RUSSELL , but it turned out to be another popularity contest. Nothing Russell has done is worse than anything Parvati ever did-- kissing boys and flirting with girls-- come on people! Watching the jury vote last night reminded me of the "want to be popular high schoolers" voting for class favorite-- SOUR GRAPES!! Let the public vote count!
Message |  Wave Agree (3) | Disagree (3)
Report
CBS--its time to listen to your viewers-loyal survivor fans should be judging this compitition!!--not rejected cry-babies who clearly dont understand that SURVIVAL can get dirty.That jury was prejudiced,unfair game--IDIOTS!--Russell is a !$#!#y,arogaunt,manipulating schemer--But arnt they all ??--thats the game dumb-ass's.
Message |  Wave Agree (2) | Disagree (2)
Report
i think it is truely time for a change popularite was meant to be apart of the game but the main ideal is to out wit, out play russel grew on me to i have to admit i hated him at first to but the man has play the game to a t and still it was given to some one that had game at all
Message |  Wave Agree (2) | Disagree (1)
Report
was meant to be apart of the game but the main ideal is to out wit, out play russel grew on me to i have to admit i hated him at first to but the man has play the game to a t and still it was given to some one that had game at all
Message |  Wave Agree (1) | Disagree (1)
Report
If Russell was as smart as he claims to be, he would have realized in BOTH seasons that he needed to be a little nicer to people in order to get their vote at the end. Hell, the rules have been in place for ten years now. The TRUTH is that Russell couldn't get as far as he did without being a complete jerk to everyone. He accused Sandra of getting as far as she did because she was riding his coattails, but a big part of why HE HIMSELF was still around was because as they got closer to the end, everyone wanted to go up against him in the final tribal council. Oh, and for those people that think America should get a vote, please just stop watching Survivor. If the fans got a vote, then every player would just be hamming it up for the cameras and trying to kiss America's A$$. If you don't believe me, then go watch the first season of Big Brother. It was awful. RUSSELL IS A BABY.
Message |  Wave Agree (4) | Disagree (1)
Report
This is a an idiotic thread. Russel screwed him self over. The poster complaining here are as bad as Russell. He does not win so lets change the rules. If the rules change it now because a complete screw the other guy game and justify it in the confessional so viewers understand the logic. It easy to recognized what he is doing when you watch it but different when you are the one he screwed. I wonder how many of you would be willing to vote him a million dollars after he screwed you out of your chance. There have been many winner to this game. Good and evil. Russell is great at promising things and not worrying about the consequences. This is a game of consequences. To outwit means you got away with it. Unfortunately he did not. He screwed up. He took Sandra to the finale. Big Mistake!
Message |  Wave Agree (3) | Disagree (2)
Reply to the topic

News from our partners